Blogs

By Lorena Guzmán-Díaz

Edited by Elissa D. Hecker

Below, for your browsing convenience, the categories are divided into: Entertainment, Arts, Sports, Technology/Media, and General News.

Entertainment

RIAA and Major Record Labels Sue AI Music Generators

Major record labels, including Sony, Universal, and Warner, have filed lawsuits against digital music generation companies Udio and Suno, alleging that they used copyrighted music to train their artificial intelligence systems. The companies allow users to create songs instantly by submitting text commands similar to AI image generation services. The record labels claim that the AI systems were trained on their copyrighted material, leading to copyright infringement. The companies defend their methods, stating that they aim to create new, original music and do not simply replicate existing content. This legal battle reflects similar cases where creative industries have accused AI companies of using their content without permission for training purposes.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/25/arts/music/record-labels-ai-lawsuit-sony-universal-warner.html

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/us-record-labels-are-suing-ai-music-generators-alleging-copyright-infr-rcna158660

Suno and Udio’s “Lawless” Behavior Cheapens Human Creativity with Sound-a-Likes and Knock-Offs Says Watershed RIAA Lawsuit

The RIAA claims that both companies have infringed copyright on a massive scale, which could have a devastating impact on human creativity by flooding the market with machine-generated music that competes with and cheapens genuine recordings. The RIAA argues that fair use does not apply to AI training and that AI companies must abide by copyright laws to protect human creativity. The lawsuits against Suno and Udio are the first major legal actions taken by the music industry against AI-generated music, with the RIAA seeking statutory damages for copyright infringement. The issue of fair use in AI training remains a key point of contention in the legal battle, with potential damages amounting to significant sums. AI companies like Suno and Udio may seek licensing deals with rights owners to mitigate potential damages as the litigation progresses.

https://completemusicupdate.com/suno-and-udios-lawless-behaviour-cheapens-human-creativity-with-sound-a-likes-and-knock-offs-says-watershed-riaa-lawsuit/  

https://techcrunch.com/2024/06/25/the-riaas-lawsuit-against-generative-music-startups-will-be-the-bloodbath-ai-needs/

Udio Responds To RIAA Lawsuit As Body Hits Back At Suno CEO

Udio responded to the allegations by defending its position on 'fair use'. It emphasized that its music model learns from examples and is designed to create music reflecting new ideas, not reproduce copyrighted works. The company compared itself to past disruptive music-making technologies and believes that AI technology can ultimately benefit artists, record companies, and the public. The RIAA believes that Udio and Suno have illegally copied sound recordings and are not properly licensing music.

https://musically.com/2024/06/26/udio-responds-to-riaa-lawsuit-as-body-hits-back-at-suno-ceo/

Hollywood Sharpens Aim at Online Pirates

Major U.S. entertainment companies, including Netflix, Disney, NBCUniversal, and Warner Bros. Discovery, are ramping up efforts to combat online piracy, hiring a former top F.B.I. official, Larissa L. Knapp, to lead the charge. The entertainment industry is facing challenges from online thieves who are continuously adapting to steal more content, particularly from overseas. The Motion Picture Association, representing these companies, aims to combat piracy through the Alliance for Creativity and Entertainment (ACE) and is pushing for legislation to block access to overseas piracy sites. Despite facing resistance from tech lobbyists, including the Computer and Communications Industry Association, the industry sees antipiracy efforts as crucial for growth and combatting global organized crime.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/24/business/hollywood-piracy.html

New Spotify Subscription Tiers Unintentionally Confirm Music’s Value

Spotify's new subscription tiers have been outlined, stressing the importance of music in its streaming service's offerings. Music remains the core of Spotify's value, yet the reclassification of its subscription plans has sparked disputes with songwriters and music publishers over royalty payments. The Mechanical Licensing Collective has initiated legal action against Spotify for unpaid royalties. Additionally, there have been references to trending posts on music technology and key music industry influencers.

https://www.hypebot.com/hypebot/2024/06/new-spotify-subscription-tiers-unintentionally-confirm-musics-value.html

SiriusXM Wins Appeal in Turtles Copyright Suit, Digital Music Battle Drags On

A New York appeals court ruled in favor of SiriusXM, rejecting a new copyright claim by members of the 1960s band the Turtles for their old sound recordings, like the hit song “Happy Together”. The court sided with SiriusXM, stating that royalty payments for pre-1972 recordings are determined by federal copyright law, not state law. This decision follows a settlement in California between the Turtles and SiriusXM for up to $99 million. The ruling raises questions about state copyright laws for sound recordings and the possibility of the issue reaching the Supreme Court. The music industry has used legal uncertainty to negotiate settlements with digital music companies like SiriusXM and Pandora, while some artists, including the Turtles, continue to pursue class action lawsuits. The battle over royalties has led to PR conflicts between the music industry and digital music companies, with arguments around fair compensation and policy considerations for paying royalties on older music.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/siriusxm-wins-appeal-turtles-copyright-172347318.html

2 Russian Women Put on a Play. Then the State Came for Them.

The prosecution of a prominent playwright and director in Russia over their play "Finist the Brave Falcon," which deals with terrorism, is under scrutiny. The women behind the production are facing trial and the threat of imprisonment for allegedly justifying acts of terrorism through their work. This case has raised significant concerns about freedom of expression and the crackdown on cultural figures in Russia, especially after the 2022 conflict with Ukraine. Supporters assert that the play delivers an anti-terrorism message, while prosecutors insist it romanticizes terrorism. This trial has sparked outrage within Russia's cultural community and could have a profound impact on artistic expression in the country.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/25/world/europe/russia-playwright-director-terrorism-trial.html?searchResultPosition=1

Dissident Rapper’s Death Sentence Overturned in Iran, His Lawyer Says

The death sentence of Iranian dissident rapper Toomaj Salehi has been overturned by Iran's supreme court, his lawyer confirmed. Salehi, who had been sentenced to death in April for his music supporting antigovernment protests, will now have his case reviewed in a lower court. Salehi, a prominent figure during nationwide protests in Iran, was initially sentenced to over 6 years in prison and banned from producing music. Human rights organizations and artists had called for his release, citing concerns of torture and crackdown on dissent in Iran. Amnesty International has called for the sentence against Salehi to be repealed, highlighting Iran's high rate of executions and use of death penalty for political control.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/24/world/middleeast/iran-rapper-toomaj-salehi.html?searchResultPosition=1

 Songwriters Take Legal Action Against PRS for Music Over Direct Licensing for Concert Royalties

A group of UK songwriters and composers, led by Robert Fripp, has taken legal action against PRS For Music, their collective management organization. The lawsuit aims to address issues, such as the right to direct license live performance rights, transparency in international deductions, and concerns about the Major Live Concert Service. The claimants argue that PRS policies are not in the best interests of its members and are seeking reforms through the courts. PRS For Music disputes the allegations, stating that it has engaged with the claimants over the years and made efforts to simplify processes for members. The legal action comes after PRS For Music announced a reduction in admin rates for online royalties collection.

https://www.musicweek.com/publishing/read/songwriters-take-legal-action-against-prs-for-music-over-direct-licensing-for-concert-royalties/090035

Arts

A Rubens Returns to a German Castle, 80 Years After It Was Stolen

An oil painting by Peter Paul Rubens depicting a saint that was stolen from Friedenstein Castle in Germany during World War II is being returned after 80 years. The painting, depicting "St. Gregory of Nazianzus," was taken by the ducal family that once owned the castle in the final weeks of the war. The painting was later sold and ended up in a Buffalo museum, which has agreed to return it to the castle's foundation. The return of the painting is part of an effort to restore the historic integrity of the castle's art collection, which includes a series of five Rubens sketches. The settlement involves compensation for the Buffalo museum and was facilitated by Christie's auction house. The return of the painting is seen as a step towards further restitution of looted artworks from Friedenstein Castle, which suffered extensive losses during the war.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/21/arts/design/rubens-germany-castle-ww2-looted.html?searchResultPosition=1

Amid Challenges, Small New York City Museums Are Closing Their Doors

Small museums in New York City are facing economic challenges, leading to closures, mergers, and relocations. Institutions like the Center for Italian Modern Art, Fotografiska New York, and the Rubin Museum of Art have either closed or made significant changes due to financial difficulties. The pandemic caused financial strain, with many museums struggling to cover operating costs and facing declines in attendance and fundraising efforts. Some museums are dipping into reserves or endowments to stay afloat. Despite efforts to secure funding and adapt to the changing landscape, smaller institutions are finding it increasingly difficult to compete for grants and support. As visitor habits and financial pressures evolve, some museums are considering merging with larger organizations to survive.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/28/arts/design/fotografiska-new-york-city-museums-closures.html

A Court Ruled That an Exhibit Discriminated Against Men. Now It’s in the Women’s Restroom.

The Museum of Old and New Art in Tasmania encountered a legal decision declaring its "Ladies Lounge" exhibition discriminatory against men. Reacting to this, the curator relocated parts of the installation, including Picasso artworks, to a women’s restroom. Originally conceived as a place for female enjoyment, the exhibition's women-only access policy led to a court finding it discriminatory. The curator intends to appeal while devising a new approach aligned with anti-discrimination legislation. Displayed in the restroom, the collection features Picasso works alongside a drawing of a nude woman. This exhibit aimed to comment on Australia's history of gender inequality; however, after being denied entry, a male visitor filed a lawsuit against the museum for gender discrimination.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/25/world/australia/picasso-ladies-bathroom-mona-tasmania.html?searchResultPosition=1

Amsterdam Museum to Return Matisse Work Sold Under Duress in World War II

The Stedelijk Museum in Amsterdam is returning an Henri Matisse painting titled "Odalisque" to the heirs of its former owner, a German-Jewish family who sold it to escape the Nazis during World War II. The painting's original owners, Albert and Marie Stern, faced persecution and lost their possessions to antisemitic policies in Germany before fleeing to Amsterdam. The Matisse painting was sold to the museum in 1941 as the family tried to secure visas to leave Europe. The Stern family members were later arrested and sent to concentration camps, with many not surviving. The decision to return the painting after 80 years was made by the Amsterdam City Council based on advice from the Dutch Restitutions Commission, providing symbolic justice for the family. The museum's director emphasized the personal and historical importance of returning the artwork over its monetary value. The restitution is seen as a step towards acknowledging the injustice done to the victims of Nazi looting during the war.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/27/arts/stedelijk-museum-matisse-odalisque-restitution.html

Sports

National Football League Ordered to Pay Billions in Sunday Ticket Lawsuit

The National Football League (NFL) has been ordered to pay almost $5 billion in damages for artificially inflating the price of its Sunday Ticket subscription service, which showed out-of-market games. This verdict comes after a class-action trial that lasted almost a decade. The damages amount to about $96 million for bars and restaurants that subscribed to the service and over $4.6 billion for residential subscribers. The total amount may exceed $14 billion due to the tripling of damages in antitrust cases. The NFL is expected to appeal the verdict, claiming that the class action claims were baseless. The case challenges the NFL's media distribution strategy, particularly regarding the pricing of the Sunday Ticket service and the league's relationship with DirecTV. The NFL argued that offering games over the air for free makes it pro-consumer, while the plaintiffs argued for lower prices and more flexible viewing options. This verdict poses a significant risk to the NFL's media deals and could have broader implications for the sports industry.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/27/business/media/nfl-sunday-ticket-lawsuit-billions-damage.html

U.S. Swimming Stars Assail Antidoping Agency Ahead of Olympics

American Olympic swimmers Michael Phelps and Allison Schmitt criticized the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) for allowing Chinese swimmers who tested positive for a banned substance to compete in the 2021 Games. Lawmakers in a House subcommittee hearing expressed openness to withholding funding from WADA. The swimmers highlighted the lack of accountability and enforcement by WADA, suggesting that doping could jeopardize the integrity of the Olympics. The scrutiny of WADA's handling of the positive tests has raised concerns, with calls for transparency and accountability. The swimmers emphasized the need for fair competition and urged for stronger measures against doping in sports.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/25/sports/olympics/phelps-schmitt-olympics-antidoping-hearing.html

Technology/Media

Google Search Processed A Billion DMCA Takedowns in Four Months

Google Search has processed 1 billion DMCA takedowns in just 4 months, bringing the total number of takedowns to 9 billion. Despite Google's efforts to combat piracy, pirates have proven to be persistent by changing domains and URL structures to evade takedowns. The increase in takedown notices may continue, with new players entering the scene. Some of the most targeted sites include Anna's Archive and 123rutor.su, which use subdomains to avoid takedowns. Google's takedown process includes removing reported URLs from search results, but not all reported URLs result in content removal. It is expected that the rate of takedowns will continue to increase, potentially reaching the 10 billionth takedown notice by the end of the year.

https://torrentfreak.com/google-search-processed-a-billion-dmca-takedowns-in-four-months-240622/

‘What’s in it for us?’ Journalists Ask As Publications Sign Content Deals with AI Firms

Journalists are questioning content licensing deals signed by publications with AI firms like OpenAI. These agreements grant AI companies access to current and archived journalistic content to train AI models, sparking concerns about potential harm to writers and journalism. Journalists are demanding AI protections in their contracts through union negotiations, similar to protections sought by Hollywood writers. Legal challenges regarding copyright infringement and the use of AI-generated content by publishers are also highlighted. Some media outlets have already signed deals with OpenAI, raising worries about the impact on journalistic integrity and revenue streams. Overall, there are critical questions about the future of journalism in the era of AI technology.

https://techcrunch.com/2024/06/22/whats-in-it-for-us-journalists-ask-as-publications-sign-content-deals-with-openai/?curator=MediaREDEF

My Memories Are Just Meta’s Training Data Now

Meta's plan to use personal content from Facebook and Instagram users to train AI algorithms raises concerns about repurposing digital histories for AI training. Reflecting on this unsettling idea, there is a focus on how mundane personal memories may become AI training data. Other companies, such as Google and LinkedIn, are also using online histories for AI development. The implications of tech companies leveraging personal data for AI training ignite ongoing debates about privacy and data protection. Additional topics include mass surveillance in the EU and recent incidents like tourist deaths in Greece, offering insights into various tech-related issues and the responses from individuals and organizations.

https://www.wired.com/story/my-memories-are-just-meta-training-data-now/?utm_campaign=cm&utm_source=crm&utm_brand=wired&utm_mailing=WIR_SubPersRec_1_02012020&utm_medium=email&mbid=CRMWIR012019%250A%250A&utm_term=WIR_CYGNUS_PERSRECS

The Voices of AI Are Telling Us A Lot

AI voices often draw inspiration from Hollywood, influencing real machines' voices based on cinematic fantasies. OpenAI's recent enhancement of its AI chatbot, ChatGPT, introduced Sky, a voice similar to Scarlett Johansson's character in "Her," which led to controversy and a temporary pause in Sky's usage. Historically, AI voices in pop culture, like HAL 9000 in "2001: A Space Odyssey" and feminized voices like Siri and Alexa, have perpetuated gender stereotypes, shaping user comfort and perceptions of technology. Despite technological advancements, these voices often rely on nostalgic, stereotypical representations, aiming to reduce discomfort during human-robot interactions. Examples include TikTok’s voice feature “Jessie,” designed to be perky and relatable. OpenAI’s diverse voice options, including the masculine Cove and gender-neutral Breeze, reflect an effort to balance functionality with user familiarity and comfort.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/28/arts/ai-voice-scarlett-johansson.html

What the Arrival of A.I. Phones and Computers Means for Our Data

Apple, Microsoft, and Google are rolling out AI-powered phones and computers that need access to user data for improved functionality. These tech giants are investing heavily in AI to enhance user experiences, automate tasks, and offer personalized services. However, this increased reliance on AI raises concerns about data privacy and security, as more data is being processed in the cloud, potentially exposing personal information to third parties. Apple, Microsoft, and Google have outlined their data protection measures, such as encryption and restricting employee access, yet questions about user control and transparency persist. Users are advised to stay informed and cautious about how their data is utilized by these AI-driven devices.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/23/technology/personaltech/ai-phones-computers-privacy.html?searchResultPosition=1

Sandy Hook Families’ Fight for Alex Jones’s Money Takes an Ugly Turn

A bankruptcy judge ruled that Alex Jones does not have to turn over his Infowars bank accounts to Sandy Hook families at the moment. There is an ongoing legal battle between two groups of families seeking defamation damages from Jones for his false claims about the Sandy Hook shooting. The families have faced online abuse and threats due to Jones's lies, leading to defamation lawsuits and judgments against him. Jones has limited assets, and his business has declared bankruptcy. The families are fighting to collect their damages from Jones' assets, with disagreements over how the funds should be distributed. The lawyers are at odds over the distribution of assets, with the Texas and Connecticut families having different views on how the money should be divided. Jones's empire is valued at $9 million, which is insufficient to cover the damages awarded to the families.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/27/us/politics/alex-jones-sandy-hook.html?searchResultPosition=1

When The Terms of Service Change To Make Way For A.I. Training

Tech companies are altering their terms of service to facilitate the training of AI models. These updates include the use of both public and private data for AI training, raising concerns among users, especially content creators like writers and visual artists who fear their work is being used without consent. Companies, such as Google and Meta, are utilizing private data to gain a competitive edge in the AI race, despite challenges posed by privacy laws and user consent requirements. Instances of backlash have occurred against companies like Adobe, Snap, and Meta for changes to their privacy policies related to AI training. Additionally, some companies are adding clauses to their terms of use to prevent their content from being used to train competing AI systems. Users, particularly small businesses, are advocating for regulatory protections against the misuse of their data by AI firms. This resistance highlights worries about the impact on creative industries and privacy rights as AI technology continues to evolve.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/26/technology/terms-service-ai-training.html

Apple Is the First Company Charged Under New E.U. Competition Law

Apple faces charges under the European Union's Digital Markets Act for imposing unfair restrictions on developers through its App Store, the first such case under the new law aimed at increasing tech industry competition. The charges claim that Apple unlawfully restricts developers of games, music services, and other apps, with potential fines up to 10% of global revenue and higher for repeat violations. Apple defends its policies as fair, stating that is is providing a platform for developers to reach consumers. This action underscores growing global scrutiny of tech giants, with similar legal challenges facing Apple in the United States. The EU's swift regulatory approach, evident in the Digital Markets Act and the Digital Services Act, aims to tackle antitrust issues more efficiently. Despite Apple's compliance attempts—like allowing rival app stores and lowering service fees—developers such as Spotify and Epic Games criticize these measures as anticompetitive. Additionally, the EU is investigating Apple's technology fee for further potential violations.

This is the third non-compliance investigation opened by the EU against Apple since the Digital Markets Act came into force. The preliminary findings suggest that Apple's business terms do not comply with the DMA and may hinder app developers from freely informing consumers about alternative purchasing options. Apple has stated that it believes its current plan complies with the law and that most developers would not see an increase in fees under their new business terms.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/24/technology/apple-european-union-competition-law.html

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/article/2024/jun/24/apple-breach-eu-competition-rules-digital-markets-act

Russia Opens Secret Trial of U.S. Reporter Accused of Espionage

The trial of U.S. reporter Evan Gershkovich accused of espionage in Russia has begun in secret, with no evidence publicly offered by authorities to support the claim. Gershkovich has been imprisoned for nearly 15 months in Moscow's Lefortovo prison, where he has maintained a positive attitude by reading Russian classics and staying physically active. The trial is closed to observers, and Gershkovich faces up to 20 years in prison.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/26/world/europe/russia-evan-gershkovich-trial.html

Washington Post Publisher Says He Aided Hack Inquiry. Scotland Yard Had Doubts.

In 2011, Will Lewis, now the Washington Post publisher, faced scrutiny as an executive at News Corporation amid the British phone-hacking scandal. Journalists were illicitly accessing phone messages, and police suspected the company of obstructing the investigation by deleting millions of emails. Lewis claimed to clean up the scandal, but is now suspected of being involved in these deletions. He denies wrongdoing, asserting that the email deletions were part of routine system upgrades. However, lawsuits from the scandal's resurgence challenge his narrative. Former British Prime Minister Gordon Brown has called for a new investigation, citing email deletions based on unsubstantiated tips. News Corporation settled out of court, avoiding trials despite significant skepticism about their actions. The ongoing legal battles raise questions about Lewis's integrity and involvement.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/24/world/europe/will-lewis-phone-hacking.html?searchResultPosition=1

New Tactic in China’s Information War: Harassing a Critic Child’s in the U.S.

Chinese writer Deng Yuwen, now living in exile in Philadelphia, has been targeted with online harassment and threats by a covert Chinese propaganda network known as Spamouflage. The attacks have included sexually suggestive and threatening posts directed at Deng and his teenage daughter on various social media platforms, even falsely portraying the daughter as a drug user and prostitute. This escalation of targeting individuals outside of China represents aggressive efforts by China to silence dissent, defame critics, and influence foreign political debates. While platforms like Meta have taken actions to remove the fake accounts associated with the propaganda network, the attacks persist, highlighting the challenges faced by law enforcement and government officials in addressing such activities. The Spamouflage network, previously focused on domestic discrediting, has expanded its operations to influence political discussions in countries like the United States, Canada, and Taiwan. Despite growing concerns and calls for a more robust response, the network's activities continue unchecked, with experts warning of its increasing focus on influencing the American presidential election.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/27/business/china-disinformation-critics-harassment.html?searchResultPosition=1

Assange Agrees to Plead Guilty in Exchange for Release, Ending Standoff With U.S.

Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, has agreed to plead guilty to a single felony count in exchange for his release from a British prison, ending a prolonged battle with the United States. The deal took place in Saipan, the capital of the Northern Mariana Islands, and Assange is expected to be sentenced to about five years, equivalent to his time served in Britain. His release comes after years of legal challenges and a fight against extradition to the U.S. The Australian government has expressed support for his return home. Assange was indicted in 2019 for obtaining and disseminating national security material and faced a possible 170-year prison sentence if convicted. His supporters argue his actions were in the public interest and should be protected by the First Amendment. Critics claim his actions endangered national security. Assange's release marks a new chapter after years of legal battles and personal challenges.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/24/us/politics/julian-assange-plea-deal.html

General News

A Fumbling Performance, and a Panicking Party

President Biden's debate performance against former President Donald Trump has caused panic among Democrats, with some questioning whether Biden should remain the nominee. During the debate, Biden appeared shaky and struggled to counter Trump's attacks, leading to concerns about his ability to run a competitive campaign.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/27/us/politics/biden-debate-democrats.html

Trump’s Debate Performance: Relentless Attacks and Falsehoods

Trump's debate performance was marked by relentless attacks and falsehoods. Trump verbally attacked Biden, questioning his leadership and character, making false claims of corruption, and spreading misinformation about immigrants and international relations. The moderators did not fact-check Trump's claims, allowing them to go unchallenged.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/27/us/politics/trump-debate-performance-falsehoods.html

Supreme Court Allows, for Now, Emergency Abortions in Idaho

The Supreme Court dismissed a case regarding emergency abortions in Idaho, allowing women in the state to receive abortions when their health is at risk. The decision reinstated a lower court ruling that had paused Idaho's near-total ban on abortion. The ruling, which did not address the substance of the case, involved a federal law related to emergency care superseding the state's abortion ban. The decision was 6 to 3, with three conservative justices siding with the liberal wing in dropping the case temporarily. The outcome was seen as a temporary victory for abortion rights advocates and the Biden administration.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/27/us/politics/supreme-court-idaho-abortion.html?campaign_id=190&emc=edit_ufn_20240627&instance_id=127340&nl=from-the-times&regi_id=67127294&segment_id=170704&te=1&user_id=0236c45b7ba3058bdd4cb83eb64a9d71

Supreme Court Jeopardizes Opioid Deal, Rejecting Protections for Sacklers

The Supreme Court rejected a bankruptcy settlement maneuver that would have protected members of the Sackler family from civil claims related to the opioid epidemic. The decision jeopardizes a plan that would have channeled billions of dollars towards addressing the crisis in exchange for shielding the Sacklers from liability. The justices found that the deal violated bankruptcy law by shielding the Sacklers from lawsuits without consent. The majority ruling suggests that the Sacklers may need to negotiate new terms that are more favorable to opioid victims, as the decision leaves the current plan in limbo. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, in a dissenting opinion, expressed concern for the opioid victims and their families, stating that the decision adds to their pain. The Sacklers have expressed hope for reaching another settlement, but without one, they anticipate costly legal proceedings. This decision could have implications for other mass injury settlements.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/27/us/supreme-court-opioid-settlement.html?campaign_id=190&emc=edit_ufn_20240627&instance_id=127333&nl=from-the-times&regi_id=67127294&segment_id=170697&te=1&user_id=0236c45b7ba3058bdd4cb83eb64a9d71

Supreme Court Will Hear Challenge to Tennessee Law Banning Transition Care for Minors

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a challenge to a Tennessee law that bans certain medical treatments for transgender minors. This decision could have wide-reaching implications for similar laws in about 25 states. The case, United States v. Skrmetti, will be heard in the next term, with arguments yet to be scheduled. The law in question prohibits puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and gender-transition surgeries for minors. The Biden administration and advocacy groups argue that the law violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. Tennessee's attorney general defends the law, citing concerns about potential side effects of gender-affirming treatments. Many medical groups support gender-affirming care for youth. The case involves individuals who have benefited from such treatments and are challenging the ban. The Supreme Court's decision to take up this case signals its willingness to address a contentious social issue, despite past hesitancy on transgender rights. Previous rulings and actions by the court on transgender issues are also discussed in the article.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/24/us/politics/supreme-court-transgender-care-tennessee.html?campaign_id=190&emc=edit_ufn_20240624&instance_id=127046&nl=from-the-times&regi_id=67127294&segment_id=170398&te=1&user_id=0236c45b7ba3058bdd4cb83eb64a9d71

Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to Biden Administration’s Contacts With Social Media Companies

The Supreme Court rejected a challenge to the Biden administration's contacts with social media companies regarding combating misinformation, citing lack of standing for the plaintiffs to sue. The case raised questions about the First Amendment's limits on government influence over technology platforms and involved communications urging platforms to remove posts on topics like the coronavirus vaccine and election fraud. Justice Barrett, writing for the majority, stated that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate a direct link between their injuries and the government's actions. The dissenting opinion, led by Justice Alito, raised concerns about threats to free speech and coercion by government officials. The decision was viewed as a victory for the Biden administration, enabling them to continue working with tech companies on safeguarding public safety.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/26/us/politics/supreme-court-biden-free-speech.html?campaign_id=190&emc=edit_ufn_20240626&instance_id=127230&nl=from-the-times&regi_id=67127294&segment_id=170587&te=1&user_id=0236c45b7ba3058bdd4cb83eb64a9d71

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Sleeping Outdoors in Homelessness Case

The Supreme Court upheld an Oregon city's ban on homeless residents sleeping outdoors, with a 6-3 decision split along ideological lines. Justice Gorsuch, writing for the majority, stated that the ordinances did not violate the Constitution and did not target homeless individuals specifically, but rather the act of camping outdoors. In dissent, Justice Sotomayor argued that such laws punish people for being homeless and called it unconstitutional. The decision is expected to impact how cities nationwide address homelessness. The case originated in Grants Pass, Oregon, where local ordinances banned sleeping in public spaces. Homelessness remains a significant issue in the United States, particularly in Western states, with conflicting views on how to address the crisis.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/28/us/politics/supreme-court-homelessness.html

Corruption Law Allows Gifts to State and Local Officials, Supreme Court Rules

The Supreme Court ruled in a 6-3 decision that federal anti-corruption laws do not apply to gifts and payments meant to reward actions taken by state and local officials. The conservative majority, led by Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, stated that after-the-fact rewards are not criminal under federal law, focusing on the distinction between gifts and bribes. The decision was criticized by the liberal justices, who viewed it as weakening protections against corruption. The case involved a former mayor convicted of accepting a gratuity after awarding contracts to a garbage truck company. The ruling reflects a trend of the Supreme Court narrowly interpreting anti-corruption laws in recent years.

https://yrqlvdt4.r.us-east-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fonpatient.com%2Flogin%2F%3Fnext=%2Ftelemedicine%2Fvideo%2F900ad161a33447bda1663bb00c1046aa%2F/1/01000190606132a2-85d98e3e-425a-4103-b5b8-cad00873c868-000000/pN6Rb8rfBcLq7U8Izjnv6kj22tM=380

Highlights of the Supreme Court Ruling on Obstruction Charge in Jan. 6 Case

The Supreme Court ruled that federal prosecutors had improperly used an obstruction law to prosecute some members of the pro-Trump mob that stormed the Capitol on January 6, 2021. The ruling could impact the prosecutions of rioters and possibly affect the federal case against Trump. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. read the law narrowly, stating it only applied when the defendant's actions impaired the integrity of physical evidence. The vote was 6 to 3, with some unusual alliances among the justices. The ruling might lead to the dismissal of charges against some defendants, but most face other charges as well. The impact on other cases will be clearer after trial courts review them. The dissenting opinion by Justice Amy Coney Barrett argued that Congress meant for the law to be broadly applied.

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/06/28/us/supreme-court-jan-6

Surgeon General Declares Gun Violence a Public Health Crisis

The U.S. Surgeon General, Dr. Vivek Murthy, declared gun violence a public health crisis, recommending preventive measures like increased funding for research, discussing firearm storage with patients, and implementing safe storage laws, universal background checks, and assault weapons bans. This move was met with opposition from gun rights organizations, who criticized it as an attack on gun owners' rights. Dr. Murthy emphasized the need to address gun violence as a public health issue, citing the rising death toll from firearms, especially among children. The advisory marks a shift in public health-based gun reform in the U.S., with a renewed focus on research and policy changes to reduce gun violence. The response to this initiative remains divided, as experts debate the effectiveness of a public health approach in addressing the complex issues surrounding gun ownership and violence.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/25/health/gun-violence-surgeon-general.html?searchResultPosition=1

Iowa Supreme Court Allows Six-Week Abortion Ban to Take Effect

The Iowa Supreme Court ruled in favor of enforcing a six-week abortion ban, significantly limiting access to the procedure in the state. This decision follows previous attempts by Republican lawmakers and a lower court's blockage of the law. The ruling reduces the time frame for legal abortions in Iowa from 22 weeks to 6 weeks, prompting concerns about women having to travel to neighboring states for the procedure. The decision is seen as a victory for Iowa Republicans and highlights the ongoing battle over abortion rights in the United States. The article also discusses the reactions from both Republican and Democratic leaders, as well as the broader political implications of the ruling.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/28/us/iowa-supreme-court-abortion-ban.html

Louisiana Parents Sue to Block Display of Ten Commandments in Schools

Parents in Louisiana have filed a federal lawsuit to block a new state law requiring the display of the Ten Commandments in every public school classroom. The law was signed by Gov. Jeff Landry and supporters believe it is a historical document providing a moral framework. The families argue that the law pressures students into religious observance and violates their rights. The issue is expected to potentially reach the U.S. Supreme Court for a ruling.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/24/us/louisiana-ten-commandments-lawsuit.html?searchResultPosition=1

Oklahoma’s State Superintendent Requires Public Schools to Teach the Bible

Oklahoma's State Superintendent, Ryan Walters, has mandated that public schools in the state teach the Bible, including the Ten Commandments, as part of an effort to infuse Christian values into the education system. This move has sparked controversy over the separation of religious instruction and public education, with critics arguing that public schools should not promote a specific religious ideology. Walters defended his decision by stating that the Bible is a crucial historical and cultural document that provides a foundation for understanding Western civilization and the basis of the legal system. The directive is part of a broader conservative movement seeking to instill Christian values in American society, particularly in areas such as education and law. Critics, including organizations like Americans United for Separation of Church and State, have raised concerns about the constitutionality of the mandate and argue that public schools should teach about religion without promoting any specific faith.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/27/us/oklahoma-public-schools-bible.html

County Legislature in N.Y. Suburbs Passes Transgender Athlete Ban

The Nassau County Legislature passed a bill prohibiting transgender athletes from competing on teams that align with their gender identity at county-owned facilities. Transgender athletes must compete based on their birth-assigned gender or on coed teams. The bill, which passed with a 12-5 vote in the majority-Republican Legislature, awaits County Executive Bruce Blakeman's signature. The decision followed heated debates and legal challenges, with significant opposition from transgender advocates who attended the meeting. Critics, including the Democratic minority, highlighted the costs of defending the bill in court and broader issues that could be addressed. The bill, primarily affecting transgender women's participation in women's sports, has sparked major controversy and vows of legal challenges.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/24/nyregion/transgender-athlete-ban-nassau-county-ny.html?searchResultPosition=1

Trump Can Now Criticize Witnesses Who Testified Against Him, Judge Rules

The judge in Trump's Manhattan criminal trial has relaxed the gag order, enabling the former president to publicly criticize witnesses against him, including his ex-fixer Michael Cohen, although he still can't disclose jurors' identities or directly attack them. The gag order is set to lift entirely following Trump's sentencing on July 11.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/25/nyregion/trump-gag-order-hush-money-trial.html